<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darwin and dictionaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkingshift.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/darwin-and-dictionaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkingshift.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/darwin-and-dictionaries/</link>
	<description>Kim Sbarcea's blog about sustainability, knowledge management, the environment, curious,wonderful and bizarre things</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lushbooks</title>
		<link>http://thinkingshift.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/darwin-and-dictionaries/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>lushbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingshift.wordpress.com/?p=951#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>Well, if language is indeed evolving then Darwin and Dictionaries works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if language is indeed evolving then Darwin and Dictionaries works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
