No blue fairies

January 30, 2010 at 2:59 am 7 comments

I saw Avatar the other night. I was wondering if I’d bother because I’m not a great fan of animation in films. Yep, Bambi and the whole Disney thing never appealed to me. But the premise of the film looked intriguing, so when a great friend said let’s go and see Avatar (plus Invictus) in one blockbuster evening, I was all for it. I am a great sci-fi fan but glimpses of those 10-feet tall, cat-like blue creatures in Avatar posters had me a bit worried that the film might be full of nasty aliens (why is it that our fear of the unknown is always played out in sci-fi as predator-like aliens out to destroy humans or conquer Earth?).

Anyway, I have to say that Avatar is mesmerising for its visual effects. And the blue aliens are no Tinkerbell-style blue fairies. If you haven’t seen it, rush to the cinema theatre now. I had a few minutes of hassle with the 3D business and trying to eat something whilst having the 3D glasses on in a dark theatre (we were in comfy Gold Class – the only way to watch a film). But after this, I was pulled into the Pandoran world. When the jellyfish-like creatures floating to and from the Tree of Souls are seemingly in front of your eyes, it’s quite an experience.

Aside from the fact that James Cameron is clearly some sort of genius for coming up with the 3D fusion camera system, the film is multi-layered and in my view concentrates on the notions of imperialism and complexity (because of the premise that the trees on Pandora form an intelligent, interconnected network and the Pandoran people are a part of this neural network).

It might depend on your country of origin as to how you view this film. I found it VERY uncomfortable, for example, watching the Tree of Voices come crashing down. There was a clear reference for me to the Norse story of the tree Yggdrasil, which supports the cosmos and, as it collapses, so does the universe. But if American, I can well imagine you viewing this as the World Trade Center toppling. Personally, I felt it was an indictment on globalisation and population explosion – our need for more space, more food, more everything means that the Amazonian rainforest is under threat and the habitats of remote tribes are shrinking due to urbanisation and the need for more farming land (for Maccas burgers).

I sensed references to some classic stories: Journey to the Center of the Earth with its imaginary, dangerous world full of giant lizards, subterranean oceans and humongous mushrooms; Dances with Wolves or The Last Samurai and the notion of a disenchanted army officer learning about a gentler culture and eventually protecting and fighting for that culture; and the Emerald Forest. Really, it’s the ultimate noble savage tale.

At first, the Na’vi—the humanoids indigenous to Pandora – look pretty weird but by the end of the film, you start to see them as attractive, which I think is the really clever thing about the film. These are not alien creatures to be feared and reviled; these are creatures that are expressionistically human. Should you be inclined, you can now learn Na’vi, which has about 1,000 words and was created by Paul Frommer, a professor at USC with a doctorate in linguistics. I’m planning to check it out as the language was very credible and quite beautiful. I’ve never liked the sound of Klingon as it doesn’t sound credible (sorry Klingon fans).  But I have to say the English used in the film grated on me: full of phrases and cliches that are so 2010 and not what you might imagine could be from 2154, the year the film is set in. In this sense, the narrative was somewhat limited. And couldn’t we have had a non-white male as the protagonist?

In fact, there were aspects of the story I found disappointing or predictable:

  • evil corporate dudes (and IMHO a miscasting of Giovanni Ribisi) who have plundered Earth’s natural resources and have travelled to Pandora to get their hands on Unobtainium. Pandora is full of spiritual, nature-loving types. Obvious big cat fight ahead between evil humans and gentle, noble savages;
  • an over-the-top psychopath, Colonel Quaritch, a marine hell bent on getting revenge on Jake Scully, the Na’vi, or anyone in close proximity to him;
  • an inconsistency with Sigourney Weaver’s character (and how good does she look for a woman aged 60. What the hell? she’s 60??). She starts off in the film as an angry, cigarette smoking scientist, with shades of Ellen Ripley, but ends up as Earth Mother;
  • Michelle Rodriguez playing….well, Michelle Rodriguez. Sneers, brooding looks, fabulously toned arms, toting guns and shooting bad guys – you get the picture;
  • Sam Worthington – I didn’t take to him. Bland, very one-dimensional;
  • an inconsistency in the storyline – at first we think Evil Corporation are after Unobtainium because they’ll rake in the profits but at the end of the film, we discover that Unobtainium could have saved the Earth;
  • the animals were a bit predictable: horses with six legs with some funky colours added;
  • but the plant life was impressive (particularly the phosphorescent Tree of Souls) and the long hair-braids of the Na’vi people, which allows them to create a physical link to the animals of Pandora and to their Na’vi ancestors through the Tree of Souls was genius.

Personally, I think Cameron’s Titanic is a far better film but Avatar sets the standard going forward for 3D films. I would have liked a less thinly written storyline. I also wasn’t keen on the film’s music or theme song by Leonna Lewis, which was cringingly like Titanic’s ‘My Heart Will Go On’. I don’t think this film is as mind-blowing as reviewers are saying but it’s visually breathtaking – so see it for that reason.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , .

What does China censor online? Girlfriend: you ‘aint Jessica

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Baoman  |  January 30, 2010 at 7:07 am

    I liked Avatar. I saw the 3D version on New Year’s Day. I’m going to go see the iMAX 3D version at the end of Feb. My take on it is that it is a fable about natives getting even with the invaders. Unfortunately, in world history to-date the natives have usually lost their land, livelihood and frequently their lives.

    There is a feeling that we should try and make contact with the aliens that are ‘out there’. I’m more inclined to believe that this may not be such a good idea. Aliens who arrive here with much more advanced technology my simply see us a good source of cheap labour.

    Reply
  • 2. thinkingshift  |  January 30, 2010 at 8:41 am

    personally, I think that any advanced species “out there” will be smart enough to give us a wide berth and never visit Earth!!

    Reply
  • 3. Paris  |  January 30, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    I’ve just watched a documentary on the crossed ecological impacts on America and Europe due to the conquest of Americas by Europeans: europeans overfished and cut down forest in America as they once did in the desolated Europe they had just tried to escape…2 centuries were enough to crush the paradise

    It seems to me Avatar is a myth:
    let’s reinvent history and rewrite it otherwise: cooperate with locals and find a new way to live peacefully…
    It’s the Hollywood magic that turns doomed reality into a happy ending story, that’s what we pay for when going to the theatre, right?

    Reply
  • 4. Paris  |  January 30, 2010 at 9:54 pm

    By the way I forgot to tell that another documentary on Orang Outang endangered life in the hig canopees of Borneo, made me think about the Navi’s…
    But trully I can’t see any Jack around to kick the ass of Indonesians and save both rainforest and Red Fairies.
    The primatologue said at the end of the movie : there won’t be any left by 2020, except in zoos.

    Reply
  • 5. thinkingshift  |  January 30, 2010 at 10:22 pm

    Hi there Paris
    What’s the name of the documentary? I’d like to see it. The Orangutans (Sumatran species) is critically endangered – there are only about 7000 left. Infants are often sold as pets or adults are killed if they wander onto property. Habitat destruction is heartbreaking.
    I cringe to think of what people 200 years from now (when we’re living underground probably because of a hot planet) will think of us – they will ask why we didn’t do more to save endangered species and why we pillaged the planet.

    Reply
  • 6. Brian Barker  |  January 31, 2010 at 9:04 pm

    I see that Paul Fromer invented the new “”Avatar” language.

    However I like neither na’vi nor klingon as the future global language. Especially when you have to dress up for it 😀

    We also need a future international language. One which is easy to learn, as well !

    And that’s not English! Esperanto? Certainly yes!

    If you have a moment see http://eurotalk.com/en/store/learn/esperanto

    Reply
  • 7. creativespark  |  February 1, 2010 at 3:58 am

    It seemed so lovely and 3D when I was in the theatre, but afterwards, the more I thought about it the more 1D it got.

    Still, for two and a half hours it had me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Search ThinkingShift

   Made in New Zealand
     Thinkingshift is?

Flickr Photos

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia License.

ThinkingShift Book Club


Kimmar - Find me on Bloggers.com

%d bloggers like this: